Wednesday, February 03, 2016

Merck is At it Again


According to two Merck scientists who filed a False Claims Act complaint in 2010 -- a complaint which was unsealed three years ago -- vaccine manufacturer Merck knowingly falsified its mumps vaccine test data, spiked blood samples with animal antibodies, sold a vaccine that actually promoted mumps and measles outbreaks, and ripped off governments and consumers who bought the vaccine thinking it was "95% effective."

In case you didn't know, the FDA says they REQUIRE vaccines to have an effectiveness rate of 95%. So if a vaccine does not meet this requirement, manufacturers are highly motivated to fake their results. This is something Merck has done over and over. They have been caught at it repeatedly.  But why, pray tell, does the mainstream media never report these incidents?  Because they want everyone to believe in vaccines, and anyone who sounds the alarm that all might not be well in vaccine-land is branded as an alarmist and an anti-vaxxer.  Even if you DO vaccinate, but you just have concerns about certain vaccines, or question some of the information we are given, you aren't allowed to speak about that publiclly. 


I am in possession of a copy of the court documents filed in this Merck case, so I know this is real. This is not alarmist, this is reality.  The vaccines you put in your child's body do NOT confer the protection you have been led to believe that they do.  And isn't that the reason you are willing to risk injecting toxic chemicals into your child, because of the promise of that protection?  Shouldn't you be outraged that you have taken that risk for nothing? 

Here's another distressing article about Merck's Gardasil vaccine.  At a hearing of India's Supreme Court, judges expresed "frustration that the country's government had failed to provide answers to what had happened during the earlier trials of the original Gardasil and Cervarix."  Girls as young as nine were being given the vaccine and were experiencing signficant side effects, and proper informed consent had not been obtained from their parents before administering the drug. 

Why is it that we are so trusting of the medical establishment?  We progressives, we are very distrustful of the political establishment, but we for some reason blindly trust the medical authorities.  Do we not realize that they have very significant reasons to be distrusted?  That they have very serious reasons to falsify their results. CEO's of drug companies have a fiduciary responsibility to their shareholders to increase profits. So they really literally will do anything not to lose people's business. 

If you want to read the Merck court documents for yourself, CLICK HERE

Visit The Center for Unhindered Living to learn more about taking control of your health. 





No comments: